Never Don and Never Ron: The rest of the GOP field looks for a third lane

Never Don and Never Ron: The rest of the GOP field looks for a third lane



“Ron DeSantis is copying Donald Trump on Ukraine, entitlement reform, and who knows what’s next?” Haley adviser Nachama Soloveichik said in a statement to POLITICO, describing the former South Carolina governor as “a leader on these serious issues facing our country’s future” who “will continue to note her differences with both Republicans and Democrats who want to bury their heads in the sand.”

“Republicans deserve a choice, not a copycat,” Soloveichik said.

A spokesperson for DeSantis did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The result has been a subterranean primary campaign within the primary campaign: a battle for a third-ranking spot in the Republican nominating contest. It is a position that could attract a smaller coalition of traditional conservatives — as the former president and DeSantis fish from the same pond of more populist-minded GOP voters — but one that could provide an outside chance of winning.

Haley this week placed an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal decrying “the weakness from some on the right” concerning Ukraine, while criticizing DeSantis’ “backward” suggestion that the conflict is a “territorial dispute.” In recent days, the former UN Ambassador has taken to Fox News to bash both Trump and DeSantis on the topic. “Trump is wrong in this way,” she told Brian Kilmeade, in what constituted a rare public rebuke of her former boss. She added, for good measure, that “DeSantis is completely wrong on this.”

DeSantis, who in Congress was hawkish on aid to Ukraine, last week announced his public position against continued military support for the country following pressure from Trump and his allies to take a stance on the issue. And despite previously supporting raising the retirement age and privatizing Social Security, DeSantis has more recently joined Trump in saying the programs like it and Medicare shouldn’t be touched.

For his part, Pence has deliberately sought to display contrasts with Trump and DeSantis perhaps more than any other competitor likely to enter the field.

“Mike has always been a limited government, consistent, constitutional conservative,” said Marc Short, Pence’s top adviser. “Voters and donors appreciate that consistency.”

On Tuesday evening at Washington & Lee University in Virginia, Pence sought to distinguish himself from Trump and DeSantis by calling for “common sense and compassionate” entitlement reforms. Echoing the more traditional GOP position, he told reporters he could not “endorse voices in our party today that simply want to walk past the problem of national debt by pledging to never touch Social Security and Medicare.”

The attempt to differentiate themselves from Trump and DeSantis is unlikely to result in an immediate surge of new support for either Haley or Pence, GOP operatives predict. But should Trump’s campaign crumble in the face of multiple indictments, and DeSantis fails to gain traction, it could set them up as fallback options and more traditional Republican leaders.

“You have to hold onto a narrative line that separates you from the populism of Trump,” said Chuck Coughlin, an Arizona-based political strategist. “I think they have to do it. And it’s a healthy thing, a sign that there’s a heartbeat in the Republican Party.”

The distinctions haven’t just been drawn around entitlements and Ukraine. Pence has also expressed disagreement with DeSantis’ revoking of Disney’s special tax status, calling it “beyond the scope of what I as a conservative, a limited government Republican, would be prepared to do.”

On the matter of Trump’s Supreme Court appointments and last summer’s anti-abortion ruling, Pence has taken a victory lap on the issue in ways his former boss hasn’t. When the ruling came down, Pence issued a statement saying “we must not rest and must not relent until the sanctity of life is restored to the center of American law in every state in the land.”

While Pence’s Tuesday night event highlighted his position on entitlement reforms, Haley has also openly called for changing Social Security and Medicare before solvency issues force cuts in the coming years.

She has suggested raising the retirement age for younger generations, cutting benefits for the wealthy, adjusting benefits based on inflation and expanding the Medicare Advantage program, which relies on private insurers. Trump has long balked at touching the programs. DeSantis, meanwhile, has reversed his support as a congressman for restructuring them.

It’s a risky bet for Haley and Pence to frame themselves at odds with Trump’s policies, even as foreign intervention and fiscal responsibility are policy positions that the pair have previously championed.

Republican primary voters now tend to be more skeptical of continued Ukraine aid, according to a new Morning Consult poll that found 46% believe supporting Ukraine is “not a vital U.S. interest.” GOP sentiment on the issue has changed dramatically in the last year. Still, more than one-third of the GOP, 37 percent, say it’s in the United States’ interest to support the country’s defense against Russia.

Paul Shumaker, a Republican pollster in North Carolina, also said staking out different positions from the frontrunners on issues like foreign policy and entitlement reform “is not enough to get you to a winning coalition.” But, he added, it could come in handy if the GOP field dramatically shifts in the coming months and the stakes become higher with the war in Ukraine.

“It could be very smart politics come the end of this year,” Shumaker said. “Just depends on what happens in the spirit of global affairs” — and whether the continued conflict “puts us into a new Cold War mentality” as seen during elections in the 1960s and 1980s.



Source link

Republicans Won’t Take Sides In The Growing Trump vs. DeSantis Feud

Republicans Won’t Take Sides In The Growing Trump vs. DeSantis Feud



Senate Republicans declined to wade into the growing feud between former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday, opting instead to watch the two leading contenders for the GOP presidential nomination duke it out from the sidelines.

“I don’t see any particular benefit of me getting involved in that,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said when asked about DeSantis taking not-particularly-subtle shots at Trump.

“I’m not going to opine on campaign tactics. People decide how they want to run their own campaigns,” added Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) of his home state governor.

DeSantis recently swiped at Trump over his role in a hush-money payment in 2016 to adult film star Stormy Daniels, generating howls from Trump and his allies. On Tuesday, the Florida Republican again seemed to take a shot at Trump by calling truth an “essential” quality in a leader and talking up the value of character in politics.

“It’s not saying that you don’t ever make a mistake in your personal life, but I think, what type of character are you bringing? … I think the person is more about how you handle your public duties and the kind of character you bring to that endeavor,” DeSantis told British journalist Piers Morgan.

Trump hasn’t taken the veiled criticism lightly. He quickly fired back at DeSantis with a reminder of allegations that DeSantis drank with underage girls when he taught at a boarding school in Georgia, seemingly accusing him of being a child sex predator. Longtime Trump ally and former White House adviser Steve Bannon called DeSantis a “weasel” while MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell accused him of being a “Trojan horse.”

DeSantis is widely expected to seek the 2024 Republican presidential nomination ― which would put him in competition with Trump, who has already declared his candidacy.

DeSantis’ aggressive use of government power to restrict LGBTQ rights and courses on African American studies in Florida, as well as his busing of undocumented immigrants to blue states, has made him a darling of the conservative movement and generated plenty of hype about a presidential bid.

But in a post on his TruthSocial website on Wednesday, Trump called DeSantis “merely an average REPUBLICAN Governor who has great Public Relations, far better than deserved,” noting that DeSantis’ support in early polls on the GOP primary seems to be slipping.

Trump currently leads all the other candidates and potential candidates in the race, according to a Monmouth University poll released Wednesday of the GOP presidential primary’s possible lineup. Moreover, Trump has gained in support as DeSantis has fallen.

It’s still very early in the race, and DeSantis has yet to formally begin his campaign for president, but he could find it harder to make headway in the primary if legal charges are brought against Trump, in New York or elsewhere. Trump has already capitalized on the mere possibility of an arrest, raising funds and rallying fellow Republicans, including several of his declared rivals in the presidential race, to his defense.

“There’s a certain rallying around the victim that happens,” Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said of the effect that a potential indictment of Trump may have within the GOP.

Some Republicans acknowledged that attacking Trump is a risky strategy even as they welcomed a healthy debate within the party that included more presidential candidates in the 2024 race.

“I look at the current polls in terms of where the average primary voter is ― it looks like that might be a tricky way to navigate,” Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) said when asked about DeSantis’ strategy in recent weeks.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), a Trump ally, meanwhile, suggested that the ability to win elections mattered more to GOP primary voters than issues of character.

“You look at college football or basketball, winning matters first,” said Tuberville, a former college football coach in Alabama. “Character should be more involved, [but] people look for success. That’s the way it is. Win. Win.”

But Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who called Trump a “race-baiting, xenophobic” bigot when they both ran for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination before he dropped out and eventually became a loyal Trump supporter, said he didn’t hold it against DeSantis.

“You gotta stand up for yourself,” Graham told HuffPost. “Trump has got one speed when it comes to primaries, and if DeSantis did push back, that would make some sense to me.”

Cramer said DeSantis’ “strength is combat, similar to President Trump’s.”

Still, most Republican senators didn’t want to get in the middle of a growing divide between their top presidential contenders on Wednesday.

“I don’t think that it’s in any Republican’s best interest to speculate about what might happen in a Republican primary,” Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, told reporters on Wednesday.





Source link

Fed moves ahead with ninth consecutive rate hike

Fed moves ahead with ninth consecutive rate hike



The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 0.25 percentage points on Wednesday in the ninth consecutive hike since last March.

 

From The Hill’s Tobias Burns: “The move shows that the Fed’s first priority remains bringing down elevated price levels, even as the bank’s rate increases have strained portfolios in the banking sector, triggering some poorly managed banks to collapse.”

 

Inflation, which the Fed is trying to manage with the rate hikes, has been falling since last year, but it’s still higher than the Fed’s target inflation rate of 2 percent annually.

 

Some, such as economist Paul Krugman, recently said the Fed should pause interest rate hikes amid stresses in the banking sector. 

 

“The spark was lit by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank,” Tobias wrote, “where a run by rich depositors largely from the venture capital sector led to insolvency. The bank couldn’t pay depositors because their money was tied up in longer-term bonds that hadn’t yet come to maturity and are sensitive to interest rate hikes.” (Read the full report here)

 

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Wednesday the banking system is “sound and resilient” and that mismanagement led to the collapse.

 

“At a basic level, Silicon Valley Bank management failed badly,” Powell said. “They grew the bank very quickly, they exposed the bank to significant liquidity risk and interest rate risk, they didn’t hedge that risk.”

 

Powell said the latest interest rate hike was needed in light of recent inflation data. The Federal Open Market Committee unanimously approved the increase.



Source link

Donald Trump could be indicted as early as Thursday over hush money payments

Donald Trump could be indicted as early as Thursday over hush money payments



Donald Trump could be indicted by a Manhattan grand jury as soon as Thursday, potentially charged with falsifying business records connected to hush money payments during his 2016 campaign to women who accused him of sexual encounters.

A vote on whether to indict the former president is expected within days; the grand jurors cancelled a Wednesday meeting but were told to be on standby for Thursday.

It’s one of several investigations that have intensified as Trump mounts his third presidential run. He has denied any allegations of wrongdoing and accuses prosecutors of engaging in a politically motivated “witch hunt” to damage his campaign.

For 40 years, Trump has navigated countless legal investigations without ever facing criminal charges. That record may soon come to an end.

An indictment in New York would mark an extraordinary turn in American history, making Trump the first former president to face a criminal charge. And it would carry tremendous weight for Trump himself, threatening his long-established ability to avoid consequences despite entanglement in a dizzying number of cases.

Indictment, says biographer Michael D’Antonio, would be a “shocking event, both because of the fact that a former president is being indicted for the first time, but also because one of the slipperiest people at the highest level of business, whose devotion to abusing the system is so well established, is being caught.”

“Throughout his life, he has done things for which he could have been investigated and potentially prosecuted and learned from those experiences that he could act with impunity,” he said.

Trump first faced legal scrutiny in the 1970s when the Department of Justice brought a racial discrimination case against his family’s real estate business.

Trump and his father fiercely fought the suit, which accused them of refusing to rent apartments to black tenants in predominantly white buildings. Testimony showed that applications filed by prospective black tenants were marked with a “C″ for “colored.” Trump counter-sued for $100 million, accusing the government of defamation.

The case ended with a settlement that opened the way for some black tenants but did not force the Trumps to explicitly acknowledge they had “failed and neglected” to comply with the Fair Housing Act.

Since then, Trump and his businesses have been the subject of thousands of civil lawsuits and numerous investigations. There have been probes into his casino and real estate dealings, allegations of bribery and improper lobbying, fraud allegations against the now-defunct Trump University and charitable Trump Foundation and a probe by the Manhattan district attorney into sales at the Trump SoHo hotel-condominium in Lower Manhattan.

Trump is a master of delay tactics, “finding ways to endlessly delay in the hopes that the investigation and litigation will go away. And he’s had remarkable success,” says CREW president Noah Bookbinder, a former federal corruption prosecutor.

“It makes accountability absolutely essential because we can’t have people in a functioning democracy operating in positions of power with total impunity where they can commit crimes and never have to face any consequences,” he said.

As president, Trump continued to face legal scrutiny. For two years, the Justice Department investigated his 2016 campaign’s ties to Russia. While special counsel Robert Mueller never found direct evidence of collusion, his final report did lay out evidence for obstruction.

In January, his namesake company was fined $1.6 million for tax crimes, including conspiracy and falsifying business records. The company’s longtime executive, Allen Weisselberg, is currently serving jail time as punishment for dodging taxes on job perks.

Additional cases are still being pursued. In Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has been investigating whether Trump and his allies illegally meddled in the 2020 election. The foreperson of a special grand jury, which heard from dozens of witnesses. said last month that the panel had recommended that numerous people be indicted, and hinted Trump could be among them.

In Washington, Trump is under scrutiny from special counsel Jack Smith for his handling of classified documents after leaving office.

Some legal experts have questioned the wisdom of having the Manhattan case be the first brought against Trump, when more serious charges could be looming.

It involves payments made by Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, who served prison time after pleading guilty in 2018 to federal charges, to porn actor Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougal. Cohen was reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as “legal expenses.”

Politically, Trump allies believe the case actually will benefit him in the short term by energizing his base in a competitive Republican primary.

“The prosecutor in New York has done more to help Donald Trump get elected,” says Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina.

An indictment wouldn’t stop Trump from continuing his campaign. There is no prohibition against running while facing criminal charges — or even following conviction. Indeed, convicted felons have run for president before, including from behind bars.

“It boggles the mind to think that we have an ex-president on the eve of being indicted still the frontrunner for the Republican Party in 2024,” says presidential historian Douglas Brinkley. “You would have thought (potentially) being arrested would have been a disqualifying factor in presidential politics. But Trump constantly surprises people.”



Source link

Grand jury in Trump hush money case will not meet today, delaying possible indictment – live

Grand jury in Trump hush money case will not meet today, delaying possible indictment – live


Seeking ‘spectacle’, Trump wants to be handcuffed if indicted

It will be a moment many of his foes have anticipated for years – and one Donald Trump is only too happy to make happen. If he is indicted by the grand jury convened by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg to look into whether he falsified records related to a hush money payment made just before the 2016 presidential election, Trump wants to be handcuffed when he appears at the courthouse, the Guardian’s Hugo Lowell reports.

The reasons are as Trumpian as you’d expect. Here’s more from the story:

Donald Trump has told advisers that he wants to be handcuffed when he makes an appearance in court, if he is indicted by a Manhattan grand jury for his role in paying hush money to adult film star Stormy Daniels, multiple sources close to the former president have said.

The former president has reasoned that since he would need to go to the courthouse and surrender himself to authorities for fingerprinting and a mug shot anyway, the sources said, he might as well turn everything into a “spectacle”.

Trump’s increasing insistence that he wants to be handcuffed behind his back for a perp walk appears to come from various motivations, including that he wants to project defiance in the face of what he sees as an unfair prosecution and that it would galvanize his base for his 2024 presidential campaign.

But above all, people close to Trump said, he was deeply anxious that any special arrangements – like making his first court appearance by video link or skulking into the courthouse – would make him look weak or like a loser.

Key events

The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell has confirmed that the Manhattan grand jury considering whether to indict Donald Trump will not be meeting today:

New: Hearing that the Manhattan grand jury hearing evidence in the Stormy Daniels hush money case won’t be meeting today, per source familiar — matching Insider. Grand jury appears to be on standby for tomorrow.

— Hugo Lowell (@hugolowell) March 22, 2023

Grand jury that could indict Trump will not meet today

The Manhattan grand jury considering whether to indict Donald Trump for allegedly facilitating a hush money payment ahead of the 2016 election has been told not to meet today, according to media reports.

Insider and the New York Times cited two unnamed sources saying today’s meeting has been called off. The grand jurors are debating whether to recommend charges for the former president over his payment to adult film actor and director Stormy Daniels, who said she had an affair with Trump.

Insider reports that it appears unlikely the grand jury will meet at all this week, potentially delaying the indictment till next week. It was unclear why today’s meeting had been called off.

The scene outside the Manhattan courthouse where a grand jury is deciding whether to indict Donald Trump has attracted conspiracy theorists:

A protester holds a placard against Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg and billionaire investor George Soros outside Bragg’s office.
A protester holds a placard against Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg and billionaire investor George Soros outside Bragg’s office. Photograph: Andrew Kelly/Reuters

A bomb-sniffing dog:

A member of the NYPD emergency unit canine team inspects a building near the Manhattan criminal court.
A member of the NYPD emergency unit canine team inspects a building near the Manhattan criminal court. Photograph: Shannon Stapleton/Reuters

And Alvin Bragg himself:

Alvin Bragg arriving at court today.
Alvin Bragg arriving at court today. Photograph: Peter Foley/EPA

And if that’s not enough excitement for you, NY1 reports they’re shooting an episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit around the corner:

An *only in NYC* scenario … with the press lined up outside the Manhattan DA’s office awaiting grand jury action in the Trump case, a block away, a crew is filming an episode of Law & Order SVU pic.twitter.com/VyIzsH8AUS

— Kevin Frey (@KevinFreyTV) March 22, 2023

Alice Herman

Yesterday, the candidates for Wisconsin’s state supreme court election went head to head in a debate. We’ve been closely watching this race, which has huge implications for the entire country when it comes to issues like abortion, education and election law.

Republican-backed candidate for the Wisconsin supreme court Dan Kelly and Democratic-supported candidate Janet Protasiewicz debated in Madison on Tuesday.
Republican-backed candidate for the Wisconsin supreme court Dan Kelly and Democratic-supported candidate Janet Protasiewicz debated in Madison on Tuesday. Photograph: Morry Gash/AP

In a packed conference room at the Wisconsin State Bar Association on Tuesday, candidates Janet Protasiewicz and Daniel Kelly clashed on questions about abortion, redistricting and public safety. The debate reflected the tone of the campaigns, with conservative candidate Kelly casting his opponent as a liar and a partisan, while Protasiewicz reaffirmed her liberal positions on issues like redistricting and abortion and pointed repeatedly to Kelly’s ties to right wing groups as disqualifying.

In a race that has shattered spending records, the candidates diverged significantly on the question of recusal from cases involving funders and partisan supporters.

“I’ve been very clear that we need a recusal rule for our supreme court,” said Protasiewicz, who pledged to recuse herself from cases involving the Democratic party – which has financially supported her campaign. Kelly, on the other hand, implied that he would not recuse himself from cases involving major donors or supporters.

“We have a first amendment for a very good reason,” said Kelly. “You need to have a methodology so that when you analyze cases and write opinions that squeezes out all personal views and personal politics.”

Early voting for the Wisconsin election begins today.

House Republicans may be rushing to Trump’s aid but CNN reports that the Senate GOP is reacting more cautiously:

Romney and Cornyn both declining to comment on potential Trump indictment and House GOP probe of DA.
“I don’t know anything about it, other than what you guys report,” Cornyn said when I asked about his view of a possible Trump indictment, as he walked into a hearing room

— Manu Raju (@mkraju) March 22, 2023

As it became clear that Donald Trump’s indictment was imminent, House Republicans earlier this week demanded documents and testimony from Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg. That might not have been such a good idea, according to Washington Post columnist Greg Sargent.

He spoke to some of the Democrats serving on the oversight committee, which is one of the three House panels that made the requests of Bragg. According to Sargent, Democratic lawmaker Daniel S Goldman warned that if Republicans try to hold hearings about Bragg’s investigation, Democrats “could dramatize how Republicans are ‘using the official power of Congress to effectively coordinate with a criminal defendant’ – Trump – to ‘obstruct an ongoing criminal investigation’”.

Jamie Raskin, who is the top Democrat on the oversight committee, said something similar. “If and when there is an indictment, we will be able to reconstruct all the facts of this case in a way that makes sense to the American public” in any hearings the oversight committee holds, he told Sargent.

In other words: committee hearings into the Manhattan district attorney’s case against Trump could cut both ways.

Are you among those who would guess that Donald Trump is days away from becoming the first American president to be arrested? Let the Guardian’s Martin Pengelly correct you:

Donald Trump may be preparing to become the first US president to be criminally indicted but should his perp walk for paying hush money to a porn star come to pass – perhaps granting his reported wish to be seen handcuffed – he will not be the first president ever arrested.

In 1872, President Ulysses S Grant was nicked for speeding in his horse-drawn carriage.

The arrest of the 18th president, at the corner of 13th and M streets in Washington DC, was not for “a high crime, but it was – at least theoretically speaking – a misdemeanor”, the Washington Post reported.

Grant became president in 1869, four years after leading the Union armies to victory over the Confederacy in the civil war, the conflict which ended slavery in the US.

One might think that Donald Trump’s legal trouble would be a boon for Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor who is viewed as the former president’s strongest challenger for the Republican presidential nomination next year. One would be wrong, the Guardian’s Martin Pengelly reports:

Donald Trump may be in legal trouble over his alleged weakness for vice, but his predicament is increasingly placing Ron DeSantis – his chief rival for the Republican presidential nomination – in a political vise.

The Florida governor must join Republican attacks on Alvin Bragg, the Democratic Manhattan district attorney whose indictment of Trump over a hush money payment to a porn star is reportedly imminent, while trying not to lose ground in a primary he has not formally entered.

DeSantis has floated criticism of Trump over the hush money payment – and indeed did so again on Tuesday in an interview with Fox Nation. The same day, however, a new poll showed how Trump, who is also fundraising off his legal peril, has tightened his grip on the primary race.

One reason why Trump may not fight his apparent indictment in New York tooth and nail: it could be lucrative. The Guardian’s Adam Gabbatt reports:

Donald Trump is attempting to capitalize on his anticipated arrest over hush money payments to an adult film star by bombarding supporters with fundraising emails to support his presidential election campaign.

In a series of messages in recent days Trump and his acolytes have urged people to donate to the Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, established to support Trump’s bid for president in 2024.

The emails paint Trump as the victim of a political agenda of a varying cast of “globalist power brokers”, the “deep state” and “witch hunt-crazed radicals”. Each ends with a plea for donations, the language used changing slightly each time.

Rightwing House Republican Matt Gaetz wants Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis to prevent New York authorities from forcing Donald Trump to travel to the state in the event he is indicted.

The Florida congressman made the case in an appearance this morning on NewsNation – even though reports indicate Trump, a former New Yorker whose official residence is now Florida, appears willing to appear in Manhattan to answer the charges:

If I were Governor of Florida, I would not allow any Floridian to be hauled before a Soros-backed prosecutor in a blue city over politics. I wouldn’t make an exception to not protect the President of the United States.

Ron DeSantis should be standing in the breach to stop any… pic.twitter.com/jeuzxKCiGB

— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) March 22, 2023

Today is the second day of a major hearing in Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against Fox News, which stems from the network’s airing of Donald Trump’s unfounded allegation of fraud in the 2020 election. Here’s the latest on the case from the Guardian’s Sam Levine, who is in Delaware to cover the hearing:

Attorneys for Dominion Voting Systems and Fox News will return to court on Wednesday for the second day of a pre-trial hearing previewing many arguments in a closely watched $1.6bn defamation case.

Dominion is suing the rightwing network over its decision to repeatedly air false claims about its voting equipment in 2020 as Donald Trump and allies tried to overturn the election.

Both sides are asking Eric Davis, a Delaware superior court judge, to rule in their favor ahead of trial.

Davis said on Tuesday he had not reached a decision. His ruling will probably set out the scope of issues for a trial scheduled for mid-April.

Seeking ‘spectacle’, Trump wants to be handcuffed if indicted

It will be a moment many of his foes have anticipated for years – and one Donald Trump is only too happy to make happen. If he is indicted by the grand jury convened by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg to look into whether he falsified records related to a hush money payment made just before the 2016 presidential election, Trump wants to be handcuffed when he appears at the courthouse, the Guardian’s Hugo Lowell reports.

The reasons are as Trumpian as you’d expect. Here’s more from the story:

Donald Trump has told advisers that he wants to be handcuffed when he makes an appearance in court, if he is indicted by a Manhattan grand jury for his role in paying hush money to adult film star Stormy Daniels, multiple sources close to the former president have said.

The former president has reasoned that since he would need to go to the courthouse and surrender himself to authorities for fingerprinting and a mug shot anyway, the sources said, he might as well turn everything into a “spectacle”.

Trump’s increasing insistence that he wants to be handcuffed behind his back for a perp walk appears to come from various motivations, including that he wants to project defiance in the face of what he sees as an unfair prosecution and that it would galvanize his base for his 2024 presidential campaign.

But above all, people close to Trump said, he was deeply anxious that any special arrangements – like making his first court appearance by video link or skulking into the courthouse – would make him look weak or like a loser.

Special counsel alleges Trump lied to own lawyers as pressure rises over NY indictment

Good morning, US politics blog readers. Donald Trump has not been indicted yet, but the Manhattan grand jury considering district attorney Alvin Bragg’s case is meeting today, meaning we could finally find out if they are ready to issue the history-making charges against the former president. As interesting as that is, there has been a development elsewhere worth paying attention to. ABC News reports that a judge involved in special prosecutor Jack Smith’s investigation of Trump’s possession of classified documents has found that the former president may have misled his own attorneys about what materials he had. We’ll be paying attention to both these matters today.

Here’s what else is going on:

  • Ron DeSantis is finally attacking Trump as the Florida governor appears to struggle in the polls.

  • The Senate health committee is expected to grill Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel in a hearing at 10am ET, amid reports the pharmaceutical firm plans to quadruple the price of its Covid-19 vaccine.

  • White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre briefs reporters at 3pm.





Source link

Man Who Beat Police With Baton At Capitol Riot Gets 4 Years Prison Sentence

Man Who Beat Police With Baton At Capitol Riot Gets 4 Years Prison Sentence


A Virginia man who assaulted police with a stolen baton and used a flashing strobe light to disorient officers trying to defend the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 was sentenced Tuesday to more than four years in prison.

Geoffrey Sills of Mechanicsville, Virginia, was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, obstruction of Congress and robbery for his role in the violence at the Capitol’s Lower West Terrace tunnel, where police were beaten and crushed as as they tried to beat back the angry mob of President Donald Trump supporters.

The 31-year-old has already served a year and a half behind bars since his June 2021 arrest.

Violent insurrectionists loyal to then-President Donald Trump are seen storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. On Tuesday a 31-year-old Virginia man was sentenced to more than four years in prison for his participation in the riot.
Violent insurrectionists loyal to then-President Donald Trump are seen storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. On Tuesday a 31-year-old Virginia man was sentenced to more than four years in prison for his participation in the riot.

In a separate case on Tuesday, a judge declared a mistrial after jurors failed to reach an agreement on whether a man described as the Oath Keepers “operations leader” for Jan. 6 was guilty of obstruction. Michael Greene was acquitted of all other felony charges on Monday, but convicted of a misdemeanor offense. Greene is the only defendant in three trials involving more than a dozen members and associates of the far-right extremist group to not be convicted of a felony charge.

Sills — who arrived at the Capitol with a gas mask and goggles — threw several pole-like objects at police, stole a police baton from an officer and hit at least two officers with it, according to prosecutors. He also pointed a strobe light at a line of officers in the tunnel.

Sills posted videos of his actions and others on social media that day before deleting his account, prosecutors say. In one post — showing officers in riot gear — Sills wrote: “Visited the Capitol today.” In another post depicting rioters flooding into the the tunnel, he wrote: “Took a tour.”

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden found Sills guilty in August after a stipulated bench trial — an unusual legal proceeding in which defendants do not admit guilt to charges but agree with the government that certain facts are true.

Prosecutors had been seeking nine years behind bars, writing in court papers that Sills has “expressed little remorse and contrition.” Prosecutors argued that his social media posts “were those of a man proud of his actions.”

Sills’ attorney wrote in court papers that his client didn’t come to Washington on Jan. 6 with any intention to commit violence and had a gas mask and tactical gear only “because he feared a terrorist attack.”

“He did not arrive that day planning or expecting to wreak violence. There is no evidence that he injured anyone. He went because his President asked him to. Once there, he stepped into a maelstrom not of his making,” attorney John Kiyonaga wrote. An email seeking comment was sent to Kiyonaga after sentencing.

Sills is among roughly 1,000 people who have been charged with federal crimes in the riot that left dozens of police officers injured. More than 300 people have been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers, including more than 100 who have been charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury.

More than half the Jan. 6 defendants have pleaded guilty, including more than 130 who have pleaded guilty to felony crimes. Of the 400 who have been sentenced, more than half have gotten terms of imprisonment ranging from seven days to 10 years, according to an Associated Press tally.

In the Oath Keepers case, jurors on Monday found four defendants guilty of conspiracy and obstruction: Sandra Parker, of Morrow, Ohio, Laura Steele, of Thomasville, North Carolina, William Isaacs, of Kissimmee, Florida, and Connie Meggs, of Dunnellon, Florida.

Sandra Parker’s husband, Bennie Parker, was acquitted Monday of obstruction as well as one conspiracy charge, and Greene was acquitted of two conspiracy charges. The judge instructed jurors to keep deliberating after they said they couldn’t reach a verdict on another conspiracy charge for Bennie Parker and the obstruction charge for Greene.

On Tuesday, the jury returned a guilty verdict for Bennie Parker on the other conspiracy charge, but deadlocked on the obstruction charge for Greene.

Greene, of Indianapolis, Indiana, said he wasn’t a dues-paying member of the Oath Keepers but worked essentially as a contractor, providing security services. He took the witness stand during the seditious conspiracy trial of Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and told jurors that Rhodes asked him to come to Washington to help with security operations for events around the Capitol before the riot. Greene didn’t go inside the Capitol and told jurors he never heard anyone discussing plans to do so.

Greene’s attorney, William Shipley, said Tuesday that “the government’s case was a farce,” adding that “it made no sense and the jury saw it for what it was.”





Source link